Thursday, May 8, 2008

Hillary: Enough is enough . . .


Dear Hillary Campaign: (I posted this to Hillary's campaign website today as well.)

Enough is enough . . .

As cited in today's USA Today, Hillary stated why her defeat in North Carolina and narrow victory in Indiana were really a great success:

"I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on," she said in an interview with USA TODAY. As evidence, Clinton cited an Associated Press article "that found how Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me."

" . . . hard-working Americans, white Americans . . ."

There is the most odious appositive I have ever seen.

Certainly and sadly, however, it will soon be spit from the lips of every racist American within ear-shot of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and their brothers in bile who pollute the airwaves and the soul of America.

Hillary is certainly tapping into the spirit of America here.

The spirit of Jim Crow.

That is quite a "base to build a winning coalition on," a tried and true one with a long history to be sure.

Well, speaking as a hard-working white American, you have sickened me and forever. You have lost any support in any political context, contest or conversation I would have, prior to recent days, enthusiastically given.

It is not that Obama is necessarily a wonderful candidate. Furthermore, till recently, I had always believed that Hillary would have made a much better president.

But seeing what your campaign is capable of doing in terms of this vile, racist 'dog-whistle' politics--and doing it with obvious deliberateness, obvious and odious deliberateness--there can be no doubt that Hillary is simply and bluntly unsuited to be President of the United States, a country where so much human suffering, historically and to the present, is due, directly, to the same vicious racism that Hillary Clinton has decided would be expedient politically to deploy, sustain and celebrate in the campaign process.

I am sickened.

And you would be mistaken to think I am alone. Everyone among my family, friends, and professional colleagues--democrats or progressive liberals almost all of them--have seen everything we need to see to know what sort of person Hillary Clinton is.

We have seen enough.

She will not be the democratic nominee, and precisely because of this evil and other lesser, but still significant, character flaws that have been evidenced throughout this campaign--evidenced, by the way, not in passing comments or in past unfortunate political and social affiliations, as with Obama.

No, Hillary's character flaws were evidenced strategically, as deliberate and explicit political strategy to divide an America so that she might conquer it. She has succeeded to a great extend in the former, nurturing and validating a hideous racial division in America that the republicans will surely build on. Happily build on, since what is good for the goose is good for the GOP.

However, she has failed miserably in the latter. She will not conquer. Worse--or perhaps for the better--she will suffer politically, in the esteem of all Americans, and in history for the filth and evil she brought to the political process in a critical presidential election at a time in history when, not only was a more united America essential, but it was--and I hope to a great degree still might be--tantalizingly possible.

The major obstacles to a unified America able to take historical strides in combating racism, social injustice and poverty in America are, as they always have been, located in the dark hearts of the racists and the greedy among us who work assiduously to make certain unity is not an option.

These blights are the enemy of progress and human dignity. And it is these blights that have infected Hillary's ambition and as a result sickened so many Americans who once saw such promise in what now has been so sullied.

And it is too bad, because I am certain that there is greatness and goodness in her as well. More tragically, I think that the better angels in her could have conspired to make a very good president and maybe a great one.

And I for one would have been grateful to have Bill Clinton in the White House again.

But we have seen enough of Hillary Clinton.

Enough.

Tuesday, June 26, 2007


or maybe just a problem again . . .

i am intrigued by recent moves by CONservatives to bail on No Child Left Behind.

in a neutral posting
"Ex-Bush aides come out against NCLB," PBD today links to a WAPO article "Ex Aids Break with Bush on No Child." The article tells us:

"Five years after they helped craft and implement the initiative, senior administration officials from Bush's first term are speaking out against the law with increasing boldness. The shift, combined with mounting criticism from both the political right and left in Congress, is causing supporters of the law to worry that it might not win renewal this year."

the article describes the dissatisfaction since March of these CONservative republicans who have, apparently, joined the Democratic ranks of NCLB dissenters. curious about this putative parlay between CONs and Dems, i visited the Heritage Foundation, anticipating that this organization "
committed to building an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity and civil society flourish" would have some interesting and relevant things to say about this policy predicament.

sure enough i found the following quote from a January 8, 2007 speech before the Heritage Foundation by two Rebublican senators, the "Honorable John Cornyn and the Honorable Jim DeMint":


“No Child Left Behind started with some good ideas, but what Congress didn't mess up, the bureaucracy has messed up,” said DeMint, who voted against the law while serving in the House in 2001. “There is so much absurdity now within No Child Left Behind that it's going to be difficult to tweak it and fix it. We need to look at a way to allow states to get out of it in a way that would let them do it responsibly.”

clearly this has been brewing for some time. My view: CONservatives, aware that the end of the Republican Republik is coming, and that their dream of an educational "choice" smorgasboard and an open bar of federally-funded privatization funds has been dashed in a post-Operation-Iraqi-Freedom world, are retrenching and seeking to attenuate federal control over state mechanisms of potential taxation and income redistribution.

states rights redux?